Main Menu
avatar_RioG

WW question

Started by RioG, April 18, 2013, 05:42:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RioG

I actually like Ww better than mfp.  I'm pleased with it so far.  I just didn't understand the 0 thing.  But it makes sense and will help entrench new habits. 

cgraz

Does MFP use calories? I find the points easier to understand and guesstimate on the fly. And veggies & fruit being 0 (for the most part) is easy. Small numbers work best for me.
This space for rent.

all-smiles

Yes MFP is calories and you can customize your goals and your macros, which is super useful when your insulin resistant and trying to keep your carbs down.
Sufficient unto the day is one baby. As long as you are in your right mind don't you ever pray for twins. Twins amount to a permanent riot; and there ain't any real difference between triplets and a insurrection.
- Mark Twain

RioG

Quote from: cgraz on April 19, 2013, 08:25:46 PM
Does MFP use calories? I find the points easier to understand and guesstimate on the fly. And veggies & fruit being 0 (for the most part) is easy. Small numbers work best for me.

I found  always felt bad for going over calories on my fitness pal... it was defeating.  but with WW you get the weekly allowance, so it's easier for me.  Plus I like that some foods are more heavily weighted, even if cal content is the same.  So an apple is 0, but same calories in chocolate isn't 0, steering you towards apple over chocolate.  But if you desperately need the chocolate you can have it and still be w/in points. 

Run Amok

Quote from: leggova on April 19, 2013, 01:46:46 AM
The thing that I don't like about things like my fitness pal is that it is so much easier to keep track if you eat packaged foods. You can just scan it in. But if you eat a lot of varied recipes of "real" food it is a lot more time consuming. Kind of defeats the purpose of trying to encourage you to eat well.

I didn't have this issue and don't eat a lot of packaged foods. But, a meal for me is often something like 1 egg, veggies, some oil, some spices. I track the oil, but not the spices. If I make soup, or a recipe, it goes in the tracker and then it's in my favorites and easy to drop into a meal. I do some estimating. It can only be so accurate. So, the lentil soup I make is around 90 calories/cup. I just find one in the database with a similar profile and use that.

fancypants

Quote from: all-smiles on April 19, 2013, 08:14:10 PM
Yeah I ended up canceling WW under the 2 week guarantee; I just found the platform way too clunky compared to MFP.  And I think the recipe builder on MFP is super easy to use so I already have a good bit put in there.  Getting an actual food scale has been eye opening for sure :e)
Ah yes, a food scale and a measuring cup, and all of a sudden I was losing weight!
I don't have time for laundry; I'm trying to have a great life.

http://herheiness.wordpress.com/

wherestheportojohn

I recall in our first few weeks of WW, when measuring and weighing demos were done....to the dismay of the audience.
;)
American portions are commonly 2-4x what should be served.

There were many peeps in our class who'd never read a food label.
Didnt have a clue that the soda or bag of chips with their lunch was actually NOT single portion. LOLz
On, Wisconsin

merigayle

WW was where i learned portion control. I thought cereal, pasta, etc, one BOWL FULL was ONE portion. But in reality, that is 2-4 portions!
Fionn mac Cumhail :Meri will rise from the casket and beat you...and then run one last Badwater before burying herself.

Courtney

Quote from: Ice Cream on April 19, 2013, 04:39:48 PM
Cheater.    :P

Ok.

It seems to be a common way to do stuff, because of the way the recipe builder works, tho.