Main Menu
avatar_Ice Cream

How do you all feel about age-graded calculators?

Started by Ice Cream, October 24, 2014, 08:25:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ice Cream

I question how fast I should have been able to run, as predicted by these.

Richard21142

Age-grade calculators are something that makes you feel better about being old.

rayman54

I find that they work quite well.  I've been doing a particular race for the past 25 years.  I plotted my age graded time vs. year and the result is a horizontal curve.  They were years where I had bad races and those data points are noticeably offset from the horizontal curve

Arrojo

They are quite accurate for me, because I have been racing competetively for 40 years, I know how fast I used to be.  An age-graded PR is a beautiful thing.
Trump sucks. "May his incompetence be a blessing" - Trotter

iwuzwilson

They are quite useful for comparing performance within an age class, but there is a bias, softening of the curve, as we get older. Particularly seen in older women. Libby James of Colorado recently scored a 106%. That's effectively impossible but it's what the calculator says.

Ice Cream

Quote from: Raj on October 24, 2014, 03:44:19 PM
They are quite useful for comparing performance within an age class, but there is a bias, softening of the curve, as we get older. Particularly seen in older women. Libby James of Colorado recently scored a 106%. That's effectively impossible but it's what the calculator says.

Don't know how this percentage works.  Mine said I would have done a 3:18 marathon equivalent...